People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns
Although big metropolis are often seen as places of opportunity, people there have to deal with many difficulties in their daily life. Therefore, I am not in favor of the idea that authorities should advise people to move to the countryside.
It cannot be denied that large cities exert pernicious impacts upon their inhabitants. The main problem that all dwellers have to face up with is the higher cost of living in comparison with small towns. They are likely to spend more money on clothes, house-renting and even food. The second issue is that living in a big downtown lacks a sense of community as they do not know their neighbors. Thus, people sometimes consider large cities as “concrete jungles”. Moreover, metropolitans stand higher chances of social problems such as high crime rates and poverty. Finally, the air quality is low due to too much fume from transports as well as manufacturers, which in turn results in the fact that residents take risks of suffering from detrimental problems related to respiratory system.
Furthermore, people should not be encouraged to migrate to the countryside because governments do not make sure that this action can facilitate the quality of big cities. Rather than moving to the countryside, governments have an ability to mitigate these potential problems by some solutions to large cities. Firstly, a simple solution would be put a ban on the use of transport that do harm to the environment and promote the use of clean public systems. A second measure would be invest more into buildings for children to play together to become good neighbors.
In conclusion, although big downtowns have many problems, not only governments but also residents should try their best to enhance the quality of city life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09278350515 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91444998741 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8724365911 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306833795012 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889474697257 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597192127701 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172635363632 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234023154212 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.