people still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. Why you think this is? Are arts as important as science and technology?
In the era of science and technology, many people still fully appreciate the value of art. While this fact can be ascribed to a host of factors, I believe that science and technology are far more important than art’ sector.
There are firm grounds contributing to the appreciation of people for artists. The pivotal reason is art has presented for the pure beauty. Advocates argue that despite the changes of time, artworks still have kept the main value. For example, the Mona Lisa which is the name of a painting of a prevalent artist in the Renaissance has been displayed in a famous museum as a symbol of unchanged beauty for many years. Another convincing reason is that the mass media published a reservoir of artistic knowledge on a regular basic in attempt of raise the awareness of people about this sector. In fact, with the aid of social media, artists easily gain popularity when they update their daily life in social networks such as Facebook or Instagram.
However, I firmly believe that science and technology play more prominent role in human society. In term of science, this sector is the sound foundation for the innovation and breakthroughs. With the aid of these breakthroughs, it is easier for people to manage their life. For instance, a digital program has made accounting work became faster with more exact results. In term of technology, these devices and inventions fortify the development of many aspects of human life. In fact, the advanced of technology supports artist to earn a living when they have published their artworks in social networks and attracted a large number of buyers.
In conclusion, there are two main reasons as why people still show their respect to artist and their artistic products which the true meaning of art and the support they need to thrive their talents. However, I am of the opinion that technology and science exert more significant effects on every aspects of human life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tworks in social networks and attracted a large number of buyers. In conclusion, there are two m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd attracted a large number of buyers. In conclusion, there are two main reasons ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93597560976 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65290681325 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533536585366 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6131270605 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291061714399 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894119557907 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875739341487 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20366487718 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108750000925 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.