People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, in the age of modernization, people have to face with a variaty of issue. One of them is working pressure. Therefore, in my view, I total agree with the view that working hours should be restricted.
On the one hand, working in a long period can harm to your both metal and physical health. The reason is when you work alots, your body, especially your brain and some neurons system or desease that you don't want to face with them in your life. Some example can support for this point is the appearance of some symptom : heart attack, stroke and anxiety disorder for example. You will feel stress after the overworked-day, so that your nervous system can be collapsed too.
On the other hand, spending a lots of time on working not only impact to your health, but also effect to your daily life. The most resonable reason for this is the decreasing of your care to the other people. This can make your life worth because of your altitude. Therefore, neighbors, friends or even your family will abandon you. For instant, if you are the father or mother who spend a lot of time or working, your child will feel lonely. Some people suppose that the money that you earn monthly is propitious rate with your time which spend on working. In my oppinion, this point of view is completely wrong. Because I think that the money or your achievement depend of the good quality product that you make.
In conclusion, I think that people should reducing their time in working to create the best life for them and for everyone whom around them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'neurons'' or 'neuron's'?
Suggestion: neurons'; neuron's
...ur body, especially your brain and some neurons system or desease that you dont want to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...some neurons system or desease that you dont want to face with them in your life. So...
^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...psed too. On the other hand, spending a lots of time on working not only impact to y...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59057971014 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32609786445 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7932161593 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1875 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186073353811 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068428689865 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074234824736 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142296109702 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790241834698 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.