A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honor, kindness, and trust no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the importance of people in these days is assessed based on their social positions as well as tangible possessions; conversely, grace, dignity, and faith are seen as outdated. To a certain extent, this essay agrees that while tangible assets can decide someone’s worth, moral values are still significant. Firstly, this essay will discuss how social media decide people’s worth and secondly, discuss how outdated values still play a pivotal role in the business world.
Internet usage would alter individuals’ understanding of worth. Namely, almost all celebrities use social media by emphasizing the relationship between their luxury mansions or cars and their worth and followers of them may try to mimic their lives to feel valuable by giving more importance to tangible values rather than moral ones. For example, the well-known social media user, Kim Kardashian, see value by many people since she has a myriad of cars and clothes. Despite this, many people do not judge a person's worth according to his or her status and assets, so maybe it is related to people’s attitudes rather than the effects of social media.
In the business sector, many employers give priority to people having humanitarian values such as grace, trust or honor. This is important because team working requires a collaboration and employees should be able to trust each other to profit. For example, a company, Turkish Airlines, select their employees with the help of oral interviews by learning applicants’ thoughts about moral values such as trust.
In conclusion, although social positions and tangible assets can decide the one’s worth, outdated values, such as trust, are still seen as essential in recruitment processes and the latter one should always be taken into consideration while judging a person’s value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39862542955 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92449755729 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2582596101 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225771257289 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880288052365 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427298914097 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138015838601 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118510875697 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.