Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue?
It is undoubtedly the case of polygamy which is also affecting the society. In this essay, I will examine the possible reasons for this trend and suggest some if the practical policies that authorities could implement to vanished this problem from the society.
The first step is to understand why this is happening? Broadly speaking , there are two main reasons for this. The first and foremost is education. If one person required good education, and have more knowledge then other have not achieved good education. Furthermore, both have different in thinking, and in behaviour. Hence both could not make the strong bonding of family. Moreover, gender are not satisfied their marriage. Apart from that communties are encourage to men for two or three could be marriages because they wanted to increase population of their nations.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem after given the complexity of its causes. However, one option has to be to improve to make general public aware if strict rules which are applied by the leadership. It would de possible to if people follow the reasons. However, if any person do not follow this rules then government should be applied more strict rules, and also put the punishment, more fine should be compulsary. For instance, a survey conducted in India. I saw that the rate of polygamy was decreased as compared to pest time.
In conclusion, there are variety of different factors that have led to make the this problem worse while it may not possible to find a complete solution of this. This could probably solved by government should be to make the new rules against the polygamy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... why this is happening? Broadly speaking , there are two main reasons for this. Th...
^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...good education, and have more knowledge then other have not achieved good education....
^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ifferent in thinking, and in behaviour. Hence both could not make the strong bonding...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in behaviour. Hence both could not make the strong bonding of family. Moreover, ...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...arriage. Apart from that communties are encourage to men for two or three could be marria...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...one option has to be to improve to make general public aware if strict rules which are applied...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...different factors that have led to make the this problem worse while it may not possible...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'solve'
Suggestion: solve
...e solution of this. This could probably solved by government should be to make the new...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, apart from, as to, broadly speaking, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97472924188 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61424436278 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9828842622 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5555555556 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727321762184 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024137754216 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325553729542 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.048905369341 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220739691326 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.