At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
While population ageing is a concern for some parts of the world, other countries have more youngsters than senior citizens. I am of the opinion that this has more benefits than drawbacks.
The merits of young adults outnumbering elderly people are threefold. One of the advantages is that young people are the main sources of labour, who contribute to a country's economic growth. In addition, youngsters tend to be more innovative and active, hence technological developments can be expected as well. Lastly, studies show that young adults have higher spending power than elderly people. As a result, the government can enjoy higher tax revenue, which is a crucial source of public spending that benefits every individual in the country.
However, there are, undoubtedly, some downsides to this. A problem is that a larger number of youngsters means there are higher demands for education and jobs. If such resources are not sufficient, competition for education and employment will be more fierce and high dropout rate and unemployment rate is one of the main causes of crime and social instability. What's more, young adults are usually less mature than senior citizens, who are also more experienced. Consequently, myriads problems could emergy in a society dominated by youngsters.
Despite this, those drawbacks mentioned could be tackled if proper measures are in place. Therefore, in a nutshell, I am convinced that advantages of having more young adults than the elderly outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...causes of crime and social instability. Whats more, young adults are usually less mat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34309623431 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90685088053 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0226075444 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2142857143 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122862234006 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451221316382 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035907020788 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776605204785 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100711034162 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.