At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Many countries now have a large population of young people. Some people believe that this is advantageous while others claim that older people with more experience can provide extensive benefits to the society. This essay will analyze both sides of the argument before giving a reasoned conclusion.
There are undoubtedly several benefits to having more young people. First, young people are more not only productive but also healthier than old people. The advantage that old people bring to the society as their experience and advice depends heavily on one factor: health. If the old people are dominated by declines in physical and mental capacity, the implications for them and society are more harmful. Meanwhile, young people have good health to contribute crucial labor. Another advantage of having a large population of young people is their ability to bring necessary changes in the thinking of themselves and the nation. We are living in the technology era, and while it is easy for young people to study new technologies, many old people find difficulties to adapt to this era. For example, almost old people cannot use computers and the internet, which play a vital role nowadays. Besides, it is generally accepted that young people are changing their attitude as per the need and always challenge the old style of thinking. This helps the country to grow and gain acceptance in the global world.
It is argued by some people that there are some downsides to having more young people since most of the youth are impatient. They usually have quick thinkings and do not think a problem from multiple views, which sometimes lead to making incorrect decisions. Furthermore, while old people are known as experienced in the community, young ones are considered as lack of knowledge and experience to deal with stressful situations. So, it seems that it is better for the society to have more old people.
To sum up, it cannot be denied that population rejuvenation in some countries has the drawback. However, by looking at its benefits as mentioned above, it is not hard to see that the advantages of having more young people outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Lucre96 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Lauriel | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | green1222 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Comments
A mild course is pushed for…
A mild course is pushed for the quality of the writer for the prospects. Change of the legit research paper writing services is pursued for all standards. Factor is piled for the judgment by the experts for the writer and its impact for the team.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06145251397 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6708234614 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4123317645 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3684210526 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17360614162 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671487635607 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533139238091 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139680904746 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499155539491 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.