Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that food products marketing should be prohibited as the advertisements of cigarettes because eating too much exerts as pernicious influence upon people as smoking. To some extent, I hold the same opinion with the idea that overeating has adverse impacts on people but I would also argue that we do still need commercials of products related to foods.
On the one hand, people who consume a large amount of food bring on detrimental health problems. To be more specific, excessive food intakes are likely to keep in your body, in turn leading to obesity. Furthermore, people who binge take higher risks of suffering from long-term physical diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and in a more urgent case, death. These numbers of people can be comparable with those undergoing lung cancer due to smoking.
On the other hand, it may not be a good idea to forbit the adverts of foodstuffs for a variety of reasons. Firstly, children can not meet their demands in life as they are not informed about these snacks, candies that they need. Moreover, advertising is a key part of modern business. Should governments put a ban on these marketings, there will be a considerable fall in the number of their consumed commodity, which thereby leads to the company’s lower income.
In conclusion, while gluttonizing has as many drawbacks as smoking, I am not in favor of the idea that these marketings should be proscipted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94650205761 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83945249547 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646090534979 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7727025423 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203231859744 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699903245228 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617640614201 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118812779735 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668680126268 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.