Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, financial investment in developing countries has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend has many drawbacks, its benefits still overshadow.
There are some undeniable disadvantages of this support that needs to be taken into account. Without doubt, this financial aid can be conducive to improve the quality of life in nations under starvation. In fact, authorities can spend money from the sponsorship on the enhancement of education quality, infrastructure development, and the growth of economy, thereby eliminating gradually poverty. Nevertheless, since the level of awareness is not adequate, money cannot solve the current difficulties. For example, if nations have low quality labor force and limited vision from management positions, they are likely to waste money on investment without fruits, thus it requires a strong control from sponsor countries.
In addition, there are a whole host of other reasons why we should not encourage these financial aids. First, due to financial assistance, some underdeveloped countries are likely to be reliant on other nations. It means governments in these poor nations put their personal benefits on their priority without caring about the quality of life of local residents, which leads to demerits to society. Second, in some certain regions, finance cannot alleviate the current issues in the short term, it should have other kinds of support. For example, in war areas such as Iraq and Arab Saudi, it is tough for them to stabilize their life, which requires more other assistance such foods, and drinks rather than money.
In conclusion, money support from developed nations might lead to many negative results. By implementing other assistant instead of money, it can contribute to the prosperity of poorer countries in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...tries. In addition, there are a whole host of other reasons why we should not enco...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of poorer countries in the long term.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46503496503 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86973274584 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.30291973 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184803670457 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613472752993 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491028513714 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11354784028 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325526390387 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.