Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer, so people tend to go to stores in the towns and cities, and then lead to their inconvenient life. Car use also causes pollution. Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end?
The trend towards people visiting stores in towns and cities is increasingly prevalent because of the effect of fewer shops in their neighbourhood. In my opinion, while this causes people to experience an inconvenient life, the consequence including pollution can be more damaging.
It is true that shopping at distant destinations could have several inconveniences caused to people. These inconveniences include the increased petroleum costs and time that people spend on roads, which accordingly make people unable to strike a balance in their budget. For example, my sister, living in a rural area, usually spend an hour on a daily basis driving to the supermarket, which is located in the city centre. Not only does this cause her to spend more time and efforts on daily shopping but it also reduces the amount of time that is supposed to prepare the meals earlier.
Apart from the cause of an inconvenient life, environmental problems caused by cars and other vehicles that are used for shopping are also more devastating. Due to an upward trend towards people driving to distant shops, the usage of private vehicles accordingly increases as well. To power these vehicles, fuels such as coals, petroleum, and oil are of necessity, all of which are thought to have an adverse impact on the environment. Thus, the more the number of cars hit the road, the more amount of toxic gases emitted into the atmosphere. Yet, this also contributes to such environmental issues as air pollution, greenhouse effect, and global warming.
In conclusion, shopping at distant shops could have a negative impact on people’s lives to some extent. Besides that negativity, the ecological consequences including the increased toxic gases released into the atmosphere are more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93449979734 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3765515478 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264029403429 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921889805109 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709785172444 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163586052504 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705037202954 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.