Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Wealthy countries should take care and cover the needs of poorer countries or they should tackle their problems independently. From my prospective, in order to get rid of poorness, unwealthy nations should take an action by themselves.
Each government has its responsibility to its citizens. First, if the problem is providing food or education, government should give job opportunities to people who really need this help. It is better way to solve an issue connected with grocery or consumption rather than just giving free food. Nations who have poor education system need to hire advanced teachers and PhDs, they can choose right teaching strategies and increase the number of knowledgeable students. If government cannot follow this method due to financial issues, so they ought to give a chance to learners to improve their knowledge in developed countries. Second, government ought not to cover the problems, they should fix them instead. In my opinion, poorer countries' governments have wrong controlling system, they have to change it immediately also smartly in order to achieve remarkable results in the near future. Because, this will influence residents' life. Non of foreign nations governments should participate in this case, the reason is that it is not their business, so they might mess up everything, as a result situation can become even worse. Because, every country has variety controlling system and condition.
Nonetheless, there are countries can not solve these problems, thus a lot of people who are living in these kind of countries facing to death. In that case, wealthy countries can help them by giving brilliant advice that could change the situation significantly. Developed nations can help them in education by creating exchange study programmes, so this could blossom students' life and give a chance to become successful employees or even employers in their future. Furthermore, poor nations' government members should make more different contacts with wealthy ones by considering all aspects which they are struggling with. Thus, by using these methods, poor nations can get improved and this can be beneficial to wealthy nations as well.
All in all, poorer nations can get rid of poorness themselves, yet helping each other is everyone's priority in extremely serious situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...nced teachers and PhDs, they can choose right teaching strategies and increase the nu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 893, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... remarkable results in the near future. Because, this will influence residents life. No...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... thus a lot of people who are living in these kind of countries facing to death. In that c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...yers in their future. Furthermore, poor nations government members should make more dif...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, really, second, so, thus, well, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 7.85571142285 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35890410959 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85743048709 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556164383562 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5609930182 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256324799488 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785032082122 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546754523799 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163934934972 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326146111272 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.