Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
The reward system is a common method used by companies to encourage the employees to work hard. As desirable as it sounds, it actually gives a negative effect on other employees.
Although incentives attract employees to do well in their jobs, its effectiveness is not long-lasting. There is no denying that certain individuals excel in their work and such act deserves a prize and these same people will obviously earn another reward in the future. But the longer the results stay as is, the more other employees will get discouraged and others might think it is biased which will result in negative acts like tardiness, laziness, etc.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive acts like tardiness, laziness, etc.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 41.998997996 24% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 533.0 1615.20841683 33% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 107.0 315.596192385 34% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98130841121 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2162214527 4.20363070211 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73376866882 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 176.041082164 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.719626168224 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 162.9 506.74238477 32% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.648049174 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929421462575 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496756111456 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0104952386677 0.0667982634062 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757385464805 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00523624544869 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 78.4519038076 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.