Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The more developing the world has, the more parents worried are because they think that their children do not have enough ability to compete with other children from all over the world. Therefore, many parents let their children study many skills as early as possible. This conception has affected many educationalists and schools, as a result, many Asian primary schools carry out English learning. Parents are happy with this policy even though higher tuitions that they ask. However, from my previous experiences, most of children who started learning English from primary school did not come out with good outcomes. Thus, I consider the benefits of learning the new language at primary school does not outweigh learning after primary school.
First, learning a new foreign language at early age would not help children master two languages well, some of children would not use the mother tongue language correctly. Taking my personal experience that I witnessed in Vietnam, most of children went to kindergarten at the age of 3 or 4 and they started learning English while they had a little understanding of Vietnamese and they could not use the language freely. It is very important to understand the mother tongue, know how to use their native language which would help them understand other languages.
Second, environment plays a vital role in the way that children study foreign languages. It is commonly known that the best way to learn a new language is go to a country which speak that certain language. However, not every one has a chance to do that. For example, in Vietnam, they had opportunities to talk with English native speakers but not in 24 hours. Therefore, children at the age of 7 or 8 may forget their lessons after class. This kind of English environment would not enhance children’s ability and would not set up correct input.
In conclusion, I do believe that the disadvantages of learning English at early ages outweigh the advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
... However, from my previous experiences, most of children who started learning English from prima...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the children') or simply say ''some children''.
Suggestion: some of the children; some children
...elp children master two languages well, some of children would not use the mother tongue languag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...experience that I witnessed in Vietnam, most of children went to kindergarten at the age of 3 or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...the best way to learn a new language is go to a country which speak that certain l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06116207951 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72483756958 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525993883792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2823963014 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30322530531 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978401450811 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858089252581 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189941908774 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488992374936 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.