Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Other value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A school of thought said that you will be addressed the way you dress. In furtherance to that, your appearance speaks of your quality. Some organisations are of opinion that their workers should smartly dress while others insist on quality of job more than appearance. This essay will discuss both sides and give opinion.
To begin with, in some organisations, appearance is their selling point. It becomes imperative that their workers dress in order to attract customers, for instance, Peace Air, an airline company in Nigeria is known for their perfect way of dressing and topnotch colour codes. Customers prefers flying with them, even though they are the new kid in the block, people has chosen them over their counterparts.
In other hand, quality of work is also very important in some field of work such as health related skills and technical aspect of work. For example, Medland hospital in Nigeria has the highest number of first class degree holders as their employees. They are ready to pay any amount as remuneration to intelligent individual willing to work for them. However, appearance and dressing is not their thing as there is a known uniform for every staff which is blue scrub.
In my opinion, some field of work that does not require technical skill and are customer oriented show business can subscribe to ensuring that their staff are on good outfit rather than quality of work. But organizations such as health and skill oriented fields should go for quality and good knowledge of work over physical appearance. All these should be aimed at achieving organizational goal.
In conclusion, smart dressing is good for some organizations that are in show business while knowledge and good skill should be preferred by firms that handles technical and life oriented issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10101010101 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62196402071 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3675556976 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351250272742 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11363619539 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720945692813 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191230073908 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811043311897 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.