Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a raising concern about whether we should look back and study carefully about our family history or pay attention to the present and future generations. While I tend towards the latter view, I have to support the former one. In the scope of this essay, merits of both views will be thoroughly discussed.
On the one hand, doing researches on the past is the optimum way to understand more about our genetic identities and therefore reduce the risks of dangerous diseases. It is true that there are numerous inherited factors such as special DNAs that initiate cancer or diabetes. In this way, having acknowledged about these signatures, we can apply proper protection on our health. Furthermore, if we actually get into troubles, we will be able to detect doubted diagnoses and take appropriate treatment at early stage instead of mistaking for normal impairments. Moreover, many people feel proud when their family has respectable and credible background. This feeling will encourage them to keep family’s tradition and greatly contribute the society with such valuation. For instance, in VietNam, one living with their forefathers who used to be soldiers in Dien Bien Phu tends to take pride in his origin and be grateful for what he has nowadays. In this sense, he will become good citizen and be prevented from becoming criminals.
On the other hand, if we consider history in an opposite view, when there are full of criminal records, focusing on the present and coming generations seems to be a better idea. Knowing embarrassing moment forefathers may lead to inappropriate mindset such as inferiority complex or glamorous life of criminal. For example, it is prevalent that one whose father committed a crime in the past is likely to be teased at school. This will cause uncomfortable situations and leave bad impact on that individual .In addition, it is admitted that the past has gone and we cannot do anything to change it. In this way, instead of wasting time digging on family history, the present and future should be prioritised.
In conclusion, after analyzing, I should investigate on study history as its benefits overweight the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and leave bad impact on that individual .In addition, it is admitted that the pas...
^^
Line 11, column 509, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nd leave bad impact on that individual .In addition, it is admitted that the past ...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and future should be prioritised. In conclusion, after analyzing, I should i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13407821229 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83718729058 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8192066623 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229450926323 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648551684592 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542290578751 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13646772057 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590522353185 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.