Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that senior employees who are 55 and above should be encouraged to consider the new version of corporations. I agree with the statement because retirement age is no longer relevant and within the new developments a one can easily remote work without sacrificing the luxury of retirement life.
Due to the new life expectancy developments, the retirement age need to change. As people live longer than before, there are more rooms to be productive and continuing to produce for an individual. Therefore, people who are reaching the retiree age, need to be supported to stay in the business life. Since they have qualified, experienced and wisdom of years in their jobs, they can be supervisors to new ones. For instance, a recent research about office productivity showed that the more varied the employee age categories, the more successful the business. This is because of interaction and knowledge exchanges between the young and the elderly ones.
Additionally, nowadays the face of maintaining a business has been changed, as the online platforms offer varied options and solutions to the companies. For example, since in many work places, job tasks became digitalised, there is no need to be present in the office environment as long as employees have their laptops with them. This new situation shows, the old nine to five work schedules can be changed, and remote working would take its place. Therefore, the senior workers might enjoy their peaceful retiree life while still continuing to work from their homes with less commuting and tight office programs.
To conclude, within the new technological developments to corporations’ elderly employees should be supported to stay in work life. This is because they can share their business wisdom with the new comers while they can enjoy the comfort of their home working as a remote.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...t is often argued that senior employees who are 55 and above should be encouraged to co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
... supervisors to new ones. For instance, a recent research about office productivity showed that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8482435541 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8243155147 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129042232549 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521350224895 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545190123548 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975577369237 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680970826581 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.