Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.
In the era of information technologies, when the level of literacy has been rising day by day, consequently the significance of information could not be underestimated. This is why, regarding whether all data should be available for free, there is a case to be made on both sides of the debate.
Those who support the idea of open share of knowledge point to the need for all people, irrespective their ethnicity, sex, political views, to have equal rights and opportunities. Free trustworthy data can positively influence such paramount global issues as starvation, high rates of mortality or even global warming. For example, if the information about the ways of preventing malaria was liberated freely, people living in poor countries of Africa would stop surviving desperately on fighting malaria due to lack of knowledge on certain curable diseases.
On the other hand, understanding of the importance of valuable scientist information should be prioritized. As the maturity of science and its development cannot be cultivated so easily, as almost all research works need financial fund to be conducted. So the source of this necessary money might be based on the sale of skillful knowledge. Moreover, some kind of knowledge should not be shared at all, as they can be destructive, for instance, the data about nuclear weapon. And last but not least, making publicity pay for scientific works and art works will teach people to appreciate labor of scientists.
Thus even though, I personally believe that whether knowledge paid or unpaid one we should decide according to the scientist `interest and wish individually. As they are the only ones who have a right to speak about the value of the work done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t 'interest and wish individually. As they are the only ones who have a right...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03570588234 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6454862876 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172066649727 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579018715178 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044069791355 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907776397992 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495920325537 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.