Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the era of freedom of speech, sharing information is not too strange for people. Some people agree that knowledge in the scientific field, business and the academic information should be publicized, while others support the some information should be kept secured because of its importance and value. I personally believe that scientific study, academic arena and business can be benefitted if all informatoin is shared with people.
On the one hand, the access of specialize information should be restricted. For instance, some information about nuclear weapons or nuclear technology is extremely importace for keeping the global peace. If that information is shared freelyh, the world will soon stand on the verge of obliteration. With the above reason, governments should prevented that valuable information to publicized.
On the other hand, some kinds of knowledge in the scientific research, business in formation as well as academic one should be opened to public which offers more good than harm. Scientists need to share their research and they need others to view and check it. Not only is it made timely adjustments to avoid making mistakes, but it also helps to boost the technological development. For example, if the Internet, which is the most popular network in the world, had not been shared by the US military, people would be still in the pre-internet era where everyone could not keep in touch with their oversea beloveds easily, cost of telecomumnication services was very high. The Internet makes the world more modern and more development. World history suggests the human race had avanced due to discoveries and inventions. Thus I personally favour the free information for all.
In conclusion, information has limitted value when they not shared with great minds. For the true global progess, sharing information freely is a possible thing in some extent, but not all, some vital and dangerous ones should be narrowly provided.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...be publicized, while others support the some information should be kept secured beca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nced due to discoveries and inventions. Thus I personally favour the free informatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29392971246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89045402206 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.180540973 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400050105861 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119142248441 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787793693832 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253197981303 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919332506376 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.