Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own experience or knowledge.
According to some people, modern life provides us with an overwhelming number of options. I strongly agree as, in the era of internet and globalization, we have an enormous number of options for our basic need to luxurious facilities. This essay will discuss the different choices we have.
Food is a preliminary requirement for each human being. People have many options for what they want to eat, and from where they want to purchase their food. For example, every kind of cuisine like, Chinese, Mexican, Italian, etcetera is available everywhere. There are various options like a local shop, supermarket, malls, online applications to buy groceries, whereas, in the old days, there were only 2-3 local shops for the same purpose. With modern preservation techniques, people have many choices in fruits and vegetables available around the year irrespective of seasons. If we move up on our hierarchy of needs and focus on entertainment, people have numerous options like TV, Cinema, iPad, PlayStation etcetera. Even there is a massive increase in the number of channels on Television as compared to previous days.
Moreover, gold and diamonds ought to be the most expensive needs nowadays as compared to earlier days when gold and diamonds are available only in the form of jewellery, in present time people can get them in pen, wristwatches, specs, etcetera. Furthermore, any part of the world is reachable with various options in transportation. So, people have numberless destinations for their luxurious vacation. For example, in ’90s people cannot even think to go abroad for their honeymoon in India.
To conclude, the advancement of science and technologies and widespread use of the internet have made people’s life easier, providing multiple choices for their basic needs as well as a luxurious lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34020618557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98397367823 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0663789553 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181057657734 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627399727737 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356927306462 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106876045834 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297021562519 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.