Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether to punish all kinds of criminal offenders with fixed circumstances. In my opinion, I believe that the criminals should be sentenced differently, according to their motivation and the extent to the damages.
There are several advantages to carry out fixed punishments, as it is a fair measure to everyone one because the punishments would not change by different people. For example, in China, the laws have been set out by the National People’s Congress and if people who have broken the laws, they would be punished by the laws without any changing. As a result, the offenders would get same punishments regardless their reasons for crimes.
Others, conversely, argue that society should distinguish the criminals by their motivations because some people who do something wrong for some reasonable things. For example, one who has stolen a piece of bread may just want to save his dying nephew’s life, which is a famous story written by Victor Hugo, so his purpose was not so bad and without his crime another one would die. By that I mean, not all the criminals have same reasons, so we can not judge their behaviors rarely depend on the recorded lows, and they should be punished after judging their motivations. By doing this, not only can should the balance stroke by the laws but also punish the people who do extremely bad things in a severe way.
To conclude, both views have their own reasons and examples and for my part, I firmly believe that people should be punished separately, distinguished by the certain cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a severe way" with adverb for "severe"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the people who do extremely bad things in a severe way. To conclude, both views have their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, may, so, for example, i mean, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71146469944 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4727901283 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.3 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25648757327 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108230449467 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056599567584 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166489681672 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243754478927 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.