Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Free social services have played an important role for both the contributors and the society. And some argue that these activities should be required for high school students. Personally, I agree with this idea but at a certain level.
Bringing social services as a part of the education program can provide many benefits to the students and the community. For the students, participating in these activities provides time for them to develop soft skills since the lack of time for social skills at school. And community services are the opportunity for them to learn life skills. In addition, students who have soft skills tend to have a better career in the future because they have the experience to deal with the same problems they met when they were younger. In terms of society, these programs clearly can help some people in need of help. While there are numerous poor people or the disabled in the society that need assistance and the lack of community services, students and teachers can make their own move to help those people feel happy and maybe motivate them to come through the situation.
However, I believe that community programs should be taken by high school students voluntarily. The main reason is the amount of time studying at school, not to mention that they have to do daily homework or taking the test. And taking the social services will reduce the study time of the students. Another explanation is that students need to have their own time for their habit to relieve stress and gain energy in order to study effectively.
In conclusion, it is undeniable to say that doing unpaid works can bring numerous advantages for high school students, I firmly believe these activities should not be taken as a compulsory part of the school programs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89700996678 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5321499826 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514950166113 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1566501211 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270059032927 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101517087567 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838703536518 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193904227245 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637240478446 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.