Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some opine that abiding by local culture is necessary for every sightseer, others say that the variety of travelers' traditions should not be rejected by the host society. I agree with the latter statement because it would have some undeniable benefits for visitors and their destinations.
On the one hand, some people hold this view that following the regional behaviors should be a must for visitors. To begin with, it would help them have a peaceful stay without harassment. In other words, by respecting the hosts' norms, many conflicts stemming from cultural diversity could be prevented. As a result, this probably leads to much more successful communication between holidaymakers and natives, resulting in a trouble-free stay. Moreover, following the other countries' cultures would play a role in visitors' self-improving. For instance, their traveling experiences and tolerance attribute could be improved during integration with local people.
On the other hand, it is considered by some that the cultural differences should be accepted by the host country in a more welcoming way. The main reason justifying this belief would be the crucial role of the tourism industry in the countries' economy. In this respect, forcing the newcomers to follow some regional traditions, specifically those against their expectations, may reduce their tendency to revisit such places. Therefore, this is likely to have some adverse effects on tourism-based businesses such as accommodations and transportation units. Furthermore, national culture is an icon of everyone's identity.Hence it would be difficult, even impossible, to forget it and adapt to some different customs of a new place.
To sum up, although people have different views about whether tourists should abide by local cultures or not. I believe that welcoming countries that are flexible about cultural variations could be more attractive for visitors, and they would confront fewer difficulties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ented. As a result, this probably leads to much more successful communication betw...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ial role of the tourism industry in the countries economy. In this respect, forcing the n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ulture is an icon of everyones identity.Hence it would be difficult, even impossible,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ulture is an icon of everyones identity.Hence it would be difficult, even impossible,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55149501661 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07451345308 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594684385382 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.090357318 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.4 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31282918922 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110160851635 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984344067611 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20000511322 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172329900161 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.