Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
There is the issue of whether or not recycling should be compelled by legislation. While there is some argument in favor of imposing law, I personally partially disagree with making law limitation for it.
On the one hand, those who support this idea believe that laws have several advantages. From their point of view, wastes can pose major problems for the environment, such as water pollution stemming from deliberate dumping the wastes in places outside of controlled landfills and waste processing, contaminating run-off water and rain water and finally enter the water cycle, being a serious threat to both human and animals health. Notwithstanding individuals usually are aware of these problems, they are reluctant to recycle their wastes. They also mentioned that a vast majority of people usually don't perform the corrects if it is not made compulsory for them. Therefore, laws lobby point out, the best way for increasing recycling would be that imposing harsh penalties or enforcing a restricted law.
On the other hand, I believe that there are several ways to iron out this problem. Firstly, raising public awareness about environmental problems would be probably the first step toward ameliorating the problems. It means that citizens should be warned about the risk of water and soil contamination as a result of non-recycled wastes for their health. This can be done via different media and through celebrities and high spoke-person profile, athletes champions, movie stars and performer for instance. Secondly, governments can be introduced some incentives to encourage city dwellers to recycle. The tax incentive would be potential remedies or giving them recycled products as rewards, as we can see in the USA.
In conclusion, whereas forcing individuals is a way to grow to recycle, I claim that willing people to do it through health warning and rewarding would be more effective way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is the issue of whether or not recycling should be compelled by legisl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...als health. Notwithstanding individuals usually are aware of these problems, they are reluc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... that a vast majority of people usually dont perform the corrects if it is not made ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28852459016 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86873817103 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63606557377 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5654892892 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229460184836 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752197877774 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477634062272 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143564501213 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373066393658 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.