Some people prefer doing the same things all the time. Others, however, think that changes are necessary.
There is a common division of people in to two types: the ones who prefer tradition and stick to something for as long as the time enables and the others who are innovators and for whom change is the name of the game. The author considers himself the first type though he recognizes that both views should be acknowledged and discussed.
People who can be described as conservatives and traditionalists have a very firm and definite belief about how the world around them works and how they see themselves as the small, tiny part of it. For such people it is absolutely important to be a successful part of the system because they understand their own importance as the small part of the large mechanism. the logic is very simple: every part counts. This is the reason why conservative people possess such characteristics as decency, punctuality, loyalty and so on. They are going to do their job decently and not going to invent something or take risks. This is also the reason why conservatives have been blamed for being the driving down factor of innovation.
There is another and extremely opposed to the previously described view. Such class can be labelled as developers and changemakers. Their philosophy stands very closely to the one of entrepreneurs and businessmen because the latter category are almost exclusively risk takers. For innovators risk is something which is also implied in their views and judgments because bringing something novel to the society always bears some difficulties and backlashes. Such people should be prepared that their invention might very easily be demolished and not accepted by the society. Though in case of success the rewards are also high.
To conclude, this essay has examined both views of how to approach life. There is always a possibility to choose your own philosophy, but nevertheless none of the approaches can be described as not right or not appropriate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...long as the time enables and the others who are innovators and for whom change is the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the small part of the large mechanism. the logic is very simple: every part counts...
^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lished and not accepted by the society. Though in case of success the rewards are also...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...sibility to choose your own philosophy, but nevertheless none of the approaches can be described...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89277116274 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5969960366 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835302659486 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226957459698 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385406659762 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0511559942325 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463916718806 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.