Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it; however, others prefer to give money to national or private charities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
People have different views about whether they should donate to help the poor in their hometown directly or give money to governmental and private organizations. Personally, I believe that if funds should be allocated to professional charities that would bring more tremendous advantages for society.
On the one hand, funding money directly to local communities would be able to assist the poor quickly because it does not have much procedure. Specifically, when the benefactors want to help other people, what they need to do is just send money. If the situation of the poor is extremely difficult, such as losing a job, having nothing to eat, or suffering from a fatal illness, they could soon receive the money to cope with the difficulties and survive. Take Phu Yen province for example. In 2020, residents here had suffered from a severe flood that lasted for nearly two months. On the very first days of the catastrophe, also the most difficult time, while government support was going through the procedure, many benefactors were coming there and giving the money and food immediately. Those actions had saved many families from the disaster.
On the other hand, national funding would be more reasonable than direct support due to the majority of people it helps. Those professional charity organizations could observe a large area or even the whole country's situation to find out which are the most necessary cases. Moreover, when these charity works operate effectively, they can ensure the balanced development of a nation. According to the situation of the poverty, they would rank the necessity of the individuals, which are more serious, and make a well-organized plan to assist people. As a result, all the difficult cases will be helped and society would be enhanced significantly. By improving the dwellers’ lives fairly, the country could achieve sustainable development progress.
In conclusion, I would argue that allocating money to the government and private organizations would greatly benefit the whole country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28834355828 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90354558914 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610429447853 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4226507214 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195550606145 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583088380602 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059924264636 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116055743565 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544479720418 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.