Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Now a day, Poverty and hunger are most considerable aspect in all countries. Some layman believe economy only way to solve this problems on the other hand, Some believers thinks economy growth hazzades to environment. I am completely agree with second statement and explain both views and given my opinion in coming paragraph.
First of all, Demanding economy progress more industries for this more land required due to this incline deforestaration. That is directly impact on wildlife and environment. For instance, At Junagadh in Gujarat in India number of wild animal are glance on villages who build on deforestance land. Beside this number of tree are cutting it were directly influnce on atmosphere and cause to grow up hot temperature on earth. Moreover, industrial's waste like durty water and rubbish are dangoures for water and land. This details and examples are clearly demonstrate economy growth directly impact on environment cricumstances.
However, Economy growth solo cure to poverty and hunger. More factory establish need more human power that is directly decline unemployment and poverty. If peoples are working in companies they earn money and fuilfuth they families need like food and house. For example, Tata group provied job to more-than one billions people in the world that means It given food or selther to 1 billions people.However, The profit made by corporations who are responcible this economy growth will trickle down in form of financial benefits to be enjoyed by the straving and needy this view justified the destruction of livelhood of millions in the name of progress.
In a nutshell, Industriliazion are overcome to dangours for enviornment compare to providing food and employment and reduce to poverty and hunger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ayman believe economy only way to solve this problems on the other hand, Some believ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...azzades to environment. I am completely agree with second statement and explain both ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'demonstrated'.
Suggestion: demonstrated
.... This details and examples are clearly demonstrate economy growth directly impact on envir...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'one billion'
Suggestion: one billion
...le, Tata group provied job to more-than one billions people in the world that means It given...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...en food or selther to 1 billions people.However, The profit made by corporations who ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...owever, The profit made by corporations who are responcible this economy growth will tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss. In a nutshell, Industriliazion are overcome to dangours for enviornment com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30107526882 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92571931442 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3366953212 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144005261345 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489193322868 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537608930126 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916804977279 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061760755617 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.