Some people say that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a number of people which hold the view that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime, whilst, others believe that particular circumstances of individual illegal actions, and motivations of commitment, should always be taken into account by the court.
Those who agree with the opinion that the legal system should provide fixed punishment for each type of crime present a number of points in favour of their point of view. For instance, such changes in legislation will eradicate one of the most widespread issues that every court have to encounter with. There are situations which law could not regulate in case of the specific circumstances of each particular context. In legislation this moments are called “white spaces” and, obviously, legal system have to spend time to illuminate mistakes in laws. Therefore, fixed punishment for every type of crime would alleviate court arguments and reduce time costs.
On the other hand, those who disagree with the view mentioned above provide their respective reasons as well. To start with, if the legal system have fixed punishment, there exist at least one reason that only exacerbate situation with fundamental principles of legislation. There is a range of possible illegal activities in every type of crime that starts from the less harmful and finish the most harmful for society. There could be a million different ways to create one fixed punishment for this range but, unfortunately, in each case courts would encounter with cases that not serious enough for this punitive measure or, vice versa, too cruel for it.
To conclude this essay it should be mentioned that I am convinced that fixed punishment should not be taken into account in legislation despite all possible advantages of this decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...each particular context. In legislation this moments are called “white spaces” and, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21724137931 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65656255593 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.023086656 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.545454545 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396014252828 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14933176006 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154493724798 0.0667982634062 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297902403904 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150432819923 0.056905535591 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.