Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
Most things in our daily lives have been digitized ranging from the most common information like items’ sales to personal information such as finance, locations, and acquaintance details. This trend has created a conflict within many communities, in which they believe that the private and covert details are not to be released on the Internet. As those who are opposed to the idea suggest that it is for the sake of their conveniences. From my perspective, I regard this matter as negative since cyber-assailants have become more popular and they seem to attack and steal the crucial bits.
To begin with, whatever appears on the Internet can then be possessed by another without the initial owner’s permission. For example, this mostly happens with news and knowledge information. Individuals aim to plagiarize these because they wish to improve aspects such as reputation and recognition on the platform because they can therefore gain some money paid by the advertisers or based on the site click counts. However, this is far much worse when it comes to personal information. Such information can be considered priceless to anyone whose it belongs to, and the data can be hacked then sold on the market as if it were a common product. Yet, much worse scenarios can occur. For instance, one’s bank account can go empty in a moment as it has now been shared by many or once the address is leaked, he is possibly blackmailed in exchange for money.
It is not the drawbacks of publishing secret and private data to the Internet matter but it is the users themselves who are to blame. This trend only proves the fact that man has become much too dependent on the Internet and hence becoming insecure. They lack the awareness and the expectations that something negative may arise. Or it is as if mankind has become more dilatory and lazy to inspect the relevant dangers surrounding them. Take online banking for example. We post our credit card details on online shopping web pages because it is more convenient to complete transactions. However, giving that someday these e-commercials pages go bankrupt and one’s information is now ubiquitous on the Internet. Even though some are aware and acknowledge such a possible outcome, they are still reluctant to travel outside to buy or complete their orders and use online those services instead.
In general, from such a trend, not only we can recognize the bad sides of what was first intended to be useful, benevolent, and user-friendly, but also discover the degradation in terms of our tendency towards leading a healthy life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in general, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9792147806 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78832950955 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561200923788 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0229724751 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14232737693 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389087553848 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336931566006 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787886824877 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397304741802 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.