Some people think that the best way to ensure road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding bikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the current society, raising legal driving age is considered to be the most efficient method to control road safety. While I accept that this method has some undeniable effects, I would argue that there are more appropriate solutions to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, increasing the minimum driving age can help reduce traffic accidents, thus improving the safety of drivers and pedestrians. To begin with, numerous incidents are caused by young drivers every year. The main reason is that those drivers are not mature enough to understand the consequences of their careless driving and also inexperienced to handle unpredictable situations on the road. Therefore, by raising the driving age, authority can make sure that even the youngest drivers are aware of their responsibility for their own lives and other people’s lives when driving.
On the other hand, due to the fact that many youngsters drive without driving licence, this measure can only restrain traffic accidents in a minor scale. As a result, more pertinent solutions which can be applied widely need figuring out. One of the most effective ways to enhance road safety is to impose more serious penalties on those who commit driving offences. For example, heavy fine could be imposed for people using alcohol while driving and taking away licences of relapsing drivers should also be considered. Another solution is upgrading public transportation’s system. For instance, by speeding up vehicle boarding or reducing travel fares, mass transit can attract more passengers, that means the number of private vehicles travelling in the same time would drop to an acceptable rate. In this way, drivers and pedestrians may no longer involving unfortunate traffic accidents.
In conclusion, while the increase in legal driving age may help cut down on traffic accidents, there are still better methods to ensure road safety such as imposing harsh punishments and improving public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35048231511 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80227247982 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9588019228 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203386541553 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664598103723 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564995988865 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130698121535 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027730041513 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.