Some people think that the best way to ensure road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding bikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals consider raising the legal driving age to be the most efficient method of improving road safety. However, I completely disagree with this view because there are more appropriate solutions to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, increasing the driving age can help reduce traffic accidents, thus making it safer for other drivers and pedestrians. To begin with, a high percentage of incidents are caused by young drivers every year. The main reason is that they are not mature enough to understand the consequences of their careless driving, therefore, by raising the driving age, only mature adults will be driving cars and motorbikes. Furthermore, as older people are more experienced, they can know how to handle unpredictable situations on the road, while younger one might not be able to. To illustrate, if the brakes of a car suddenly fail, a young driver may panic, and be more likely to cause an accident.
On the other hand, due to the fact that many adolescents drive without passing a driving test, raising the minimum driving age can only curtail traffic accidents to a minor extent. As a result, more viable methods of ensuring road safety must be figured out. One of the most effective ways is having more serous penalties for those who commit driving offences. For example, heavy fines could be imposed on people drinking alcohol while driving and the licence of drivers with a record of speeding tickets or reckless driving offenses should be revoked. Another solution is upgrading the public transportation system. For instance, by speeding up vehicle boarding or reducing travel fares, mass transit can attract more passengers, that means the number of private vehicles travelling at the same time would drop. In this way, drivers and pedestrians may no longer get involved in unfortunate traffic accidents.
In conclusion, while the increase in the legal driving age may help cut down on traffic accidents, there are still better methods to ensure road safety such as imposing harsh punishments and improving public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17261904762 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73238924089 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2307040598 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237885620021 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750627487798 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555847460641 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150505577995 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243085270663 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.