Some people think that children should obey rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think that children controlled too much cannot deal with problems themselves in adulthood. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Children usually have to obey different rules at home or at school. Although strict disciplines are sometimes important, I am of the opinion that this may have an adverse impact on children’s problem-solving ability.
The main function of rules is to hold children accountable for their own behaviours and help them develop good behaviour patterns from a young age. Children are not conscious of the consequences of their behaviours as adults are, but with set rules, they will come to realize how they could behave in a socially acceptable way. For example, they could learn about how to greet others, how to make polite requests, and how to show table manners. Disciplines can also help to forbid inappropriate behaviours such as using profanity, speaking rudely, cheating, and interrupting teachers.
However, strict rules do not necessarily have a positive influence on children’s development, if parents establishing strict rules give too much priority to obeisance. Having relied on the rules heavily when making decisions, kids will lose the ability to solve problems independently. To give an example, if children’s daily activities are all restricted by rules set, they may not know how to manage time on their own, or how to cope with demands at work. As a consequence, it would be difficult for them to have a fulfilling career.
All in all, I believe that simply following rules would stifle children’s creativity, making them unable to tackle problems in various ways. This is because children dare not to put their ideas into practice, for the fear that they will be punished for failing to comply with rules. For instance, if students are told to use one specific method to write their essays, they would have no idea of what would happen if they express their own ideas in a different way. Problems are complicated in the real world, and people without creativity would not be able to tackle them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... happen if they express their own ideas in a different way. Problems are complicated in the real w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11635220126 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96909472999 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9764498029 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.214285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204283918926 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726525299707 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441538316274 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126399820032 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332842919002 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.