Some people think the government funding should be not used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion ?
it is true that some skeptic would advocate that public budget should not be invested in supporting art and culture. However, there are others who argue that supporting cultural events may be advantageous for the people and the cultures. In my opinion, I believe this investment is both socially and economically worthwhile.
On the one hand, some may have compelling reasons why th government funding should not be spend on art and culture. The primary reason is that great number of countries are facing with a lot of imperative problems such as education, health, defence and so on. For example, in some is warning, allocate budget on defence is vital matter. Moreover, the government need to invest large amount of money in organizing art and culture festivals. Instead, it would be better if these events could be financed by funding sources of private or organized.
On the other hand, I believe that cultural activities also may benefits for the population and the culture because of some reasons. To begin with, these events can help protect long-standing cultures values. When these values are protected, inhabitants will have a variety of chances to learning knowledges about art and culture of these country. For instance in Vietnam, government’s usually conduct traditional festivals, so people can study many informations about history, culture and so on. Additionally, holding festival is one of the good method to promote the economy. this is because, art and culture will attract sightseer to visit, so it will increase profits for the country’s economy.
In conclusion, while many may argue that spending on art and culture can be waste national budget, I believe investing money in these activities is vital in both social and economic aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that some skeptic would advocat...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocially and economically worthwhile. On the one hand, some may have compellin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing sources of private or organized. On the other hand, I believe that cultur...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...the good method to promote the economy. this is because, art and culture will attrac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits for the country's economy. In conclusion, while many may argue that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
... economy. In conclusion, while many may argue that spending on art and culture ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25174825175 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8809746043 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7245829915 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357962069645 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117656714869 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943323889852 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226624752812 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088523293113 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.