Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is the case that climate change is a significant problem that has to be avoided immediately. Some people, however, think that after preventing it, humans will find a new way to survive this epidemic. I strongly disagree with the problem of avoiding and living with climate change.
Climate change is the phenomenon that has been exacerbated by human ambition during recent incidents such as deforestation and emissions. Just a few decades ago, the world's population isn't as large as it is now, people didn't need to make much space to move and stay. However, owing to overpopulation nowadays, open parks have been diminished to create further houses. In fact, individuals continue to earn money to stay with their relatives. There is also a large growth in the amount of factories and businesses set up to generate more work openings for men. Nevertheless, several manufacturers and businesses are damaging the world and the climate with pesticides or hazardous waste. It pollutes the atmosphere and the environment, hence the climate was changed every day.
If people do not have some appropriate action, it will be a serious matter. People need to act together to save the world. Planning trees is an illustration, if any man decides to plan a tree in his life, millions of trees would be saved. Millions of trees that can be preserved in the future would will the shortage of sunlight and render the planet a safer environment. In addition, policymakers ought to shut down some of the plants and businesses that are detrimental to the atmosphere with using biologically damaging substances. People will need to provide knowledge to preserve the world and the community in which they stay.
To sum up, I also agree that the reduction of climate change and the protection of the atmosphere are the responsibility of everybody in the world. Humans are expected to support the World by their route.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... emissions. Just a few decades ago, the worlds population isnt as large as it is now, ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... few decades ago, the worlds population isnt as large as it is now, people didnt nee...
^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tion isnt as large as it is now, people didnt need to make much space to move and sta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...dition, policymakers ought to shut down some of the plants and businesses that are detrimen...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, as to, in addition, in fact, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98427672956 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88817775506 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5889211769 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187587097586 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561915392744 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420403775937 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11093563901 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506836176554 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... emissions. Just a few decades ago, the worlds population isnt as large as it is now, ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... few decades ago, the worlds population isnt as large as it is now, people didnt nee...
^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tion isnt as large as it is now, people didnt need to make much space to move and sta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...dition, policymakers ought to shut down some of the plants and businesses that are detrimen...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, as to, in addition, in fact, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98427672956 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88817775506 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5889211769 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187587097586 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561915392744 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420403775937 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11093563901 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506836176554 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.