Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Adapting to climate change rather than finding a solution to it is what some people believe in. A big part of evolution comes with adapting to the environment but eventually, there will come a point where this belief won't be very helpful. I do not agree with it instead, there is a dire need to prevent climate change.
First of all, the current change of the climate is not a natural phenomenon but a man-made one. The constant urbanization and deforestation of the landscape play a vital role in the increase of carbon footprint in the environment which directly leads to global warming. However, with fewer trees, all the carbon released is not converted into oxygen which is important for human survival. The very fact of the change not being natural is sufficient to say that we need to find solutions to the problems we are creating.
Secondly, adaptation to the climate is only good up to a certain point, after that, it is almost impossible. For example, Mammoths used to reside in places where there is extreme cold. These mammals evolved themselves from being huge in size and very thick fur to reducing the fur and the size in a few millennia according to the change in the temperature. After a few evolutions, it was not further evolution was not possible and finally, the species is extinct today. Like Mammoths, there are many other species who found a way to live with their respective climate changes but failed to survive after a threshold.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the statement that finding ways to prevent climate change is far more beneficial than living with it as the change is man-made and also there is always a limit to everything as in the case of evolution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: huge
...e mammals evolved themselves from being huge in size and very thick fur to reducing the fur ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erything as in the case of evolution.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76351351351 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67126991902 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9433368232 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232979748529 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812510513788 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781785385863 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140748275992 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487716702582 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.