Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
One of the most controversial issues today relates to the choices between houses and apartments. While a wide range of people intends to stay in houses, others tend to live in high buildings. The following paragraphs will delve into both points of view.
On the one hand, scores of people prefer living in apartments or flats owing to its convenience. High buildings are always located in the heart of megacities where are quite near the shopping mall, entertaining centers, and workplaces. Besides, land could be constructed for facilities namely bridges or widened roads in order to ease the traffic congestion. Moreover, living in apartments also solve the land problem in big cities, where the land is able to be bought by a prohibited price. As a result, living in a great apartment not only convenient but economized as well. Last but not least, being in the high building where the security may be strengthened more than others due to entering a building, people are often monitored. As a consequence, people incline to choose buildings. It, however, is argued that staying in a building attaching scores of payments that people have to deal with namely parking, taking out the garbage, high expenses of electricity and water.
On the other hand, it is debated that living in a horizontal city creates plenty of advantages than the vertical one. There is no denying that it is accessible to escape from a house in case of an emergency such as a fire or disastrous earthquake. Further, nearly every house owns a garden, thus, residents could receive obvious benefits from the fresh air and opened-area for mental health. Furthermore, staying in housing accommodation people have not to settle for parking and building services.
In conclusion, from the afore-mentioned discussions, although many people are keen on living in houses, others strongly believe that the benefits of staying in buildings outweigh its disadvantages. From my personal perspective, this should be considered thoroughly and prudentially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igh expenses of electricity and water. On the other hand, it is debated that li...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tle for parking and building services. In conclusion, from the afore-mentioned ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14689265537 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92289761377 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4592746918 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8947368421 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306188416362 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095812626757 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160495400614 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24347236195 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.302423702521 0.056905535591 531% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.