Some people think that schools should stop teaching students by using books because students find them boring and that children can learn from films TV video games and computer instead To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is believed by some people that the books which is used as a teaching pattern in school must be replaced with gadgets or computer. Today, we see our children moving more towards gadgets and also its been given by parents since their early childhood. So, students finds books as boring and unused method of learning . However, I believe that these electronic devices cannot takes the place of our traditional method of teaching.
Advancements in technology is making people more relaxed and comfortable that they can even calm a crying baby by the use of gadgets which is not even reducing time but also work. In this way, our children are facing issues like leading to distraction from studies and also health problems in future. However, in some way it is useful in getting their school projects done which is nowadays became the new method of giving homework to increase level of information through computers. Subsequently, distracting minds of small children in watching illegal videos and in further grows with less mannerism and hence cannot be replaced with books.
The oldest method of teaching has made many scholars in our early times leading country's development level with inventions and discoveries. Although, computers have changed our way of teaching by displaying slides but can stop at any moment which can distract a student's attention. But, teaching through books makes a chapter interesting and can be available on each student's hand which can easy for referral. Films and video games are only made for doing time pass making them away from family and society which has become a current issue in today's world. So, the method of teaching through books cannot be changed because of their old values and importance.
In my opinion, although gadgets has changed our world which is sometimes can be used for teaching but cannot replace books as it cannot be stopped at any time and it provides an availability in hands of students at the time of teaching.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (12 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... as boring and unused method of learning . However, I believe that these electroni...
^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n from studies and also health problems in future. However, in some way it is useful in g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... school projects done which is nowadays became the new method of giving homework to in...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...stop at any moment which can distract a students attention. But, teaching through books ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96978851964 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55285788751 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4464892 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192492768095 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716123162848 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445432395602 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119906658848 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251178188032 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.