Some people think university educations should prepare students for employment while others think it should help students acquire theoretical knowledge. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a school of thought that more and more university's subjects nowadays should prepare their alumnus for future employment while others think it should help students acquire only theoretical knowledge. Nevertheless, its impact on the social skill of those scholars brings much controversial debate based on the large number of unemployed people in society at present. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative sides of these arguments from a cultural perspective.
Providing the course with regard to the possibility of getting an occupation for their students is undisputed one of the main arrow for dealing with the problem of social working network today and increasing the fame of employed alumnus' rate after studying at their university environment. The first reason to support it is that despite the kinds of gaining a great amount of scientific knowledge were especially important, no one can suggest that it can deal with the global occupation's scene which has rejected lots of graduated alumnus because of their low working experience. To illustrate, we can see from a thousand of unemployed inhabitants in America, a country which is infamous for the rate of these type of problems, are sticking with many job application and doing part-time jobs for the ways of having enough money to live on a regular basis. Therefore, according to all of this aforementioned reasons, the conception of preparing the experience for applying future occupation for students from university's education is quite significant.
On the other hand, university's management should also get some imagination of disadvantage sides which would lead to dropping the successful rate of applying job such as the amount of theoretical knowledge which they produced were not enough to deal with the organization's requirement. Moreover, one particular salient article having been published by The New York Time Magazine introduced that 90% of corporation nowadays has required both labouring skill and theoretical learning when people want to work in their company. It stands to the reason that their studying environment at university need to bring them not only the course of social skills as well as laboring experience, but also the scientific lore.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that the mission of planning educational employment's class in a daily basis for scholars is greatly important, the number of lore's capacity could also value considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'occupations'' or 'occupation's'?
Suggestion: occupations'; occupation's
...uggest that it can deal with the global occupations scene which has rejected lots of gradua...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...oduced were not enough to deal with the organizations requirement. Moreover, one particular s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36950904393 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97040758955 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7103704423 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.909090909 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1818181818 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246424128372 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916651502725 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119174209797 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147850344672 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984947206883 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.