Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ?
Some people believe that adolescents need to be required to do volunteer work that will help the community. In my view, this work could have many benefits.
On the one hand, there are various advantages that volunteers bring. Firstly, this practice would have a positive impact on young people. Most teenagers want to beautify their profiles, which would be a great advantage for their studies and work. For instance, volunteer work is the best way to get real work experience, make a nice career out of social work, and look fantastic on a resume. Secondly, it was a great benefit that the community received. Many homeless and orphan children are helped by volunteer groups. There are many groups that were established to teach illiterate children and publish health projects to promote awareness within the community. Additionally, young people can find significant meaning in life and learn to respect what they have. This can only be learned through experience in their lives.
On the other hand, juniors are under enough pressure with their studies. School demands that students have responsibility for learning as a full-time job, and teachers give homework and exams every day. When young people have some free time, they should enjoy it with their friends or spend it relaxing. Volunteer work can distract them from their studies. This may have an effect on their health.
In conclusion, with all the information mentioned above, the advantages are overwhelming compared to the disadvantages. By considering all the pros and cons of requiring unpaid work, the advantages should become more apparent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68461538462 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1551025078 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5555555556 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4444444444 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264052299257 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073535901368 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094692525888 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173919153612 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854783843405 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.