Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, zoos and their roles in protecting animals have been a subject of intense debates. From my perspective, although it can be asserted that zoos also have contributed to preserving species of wild animals, I am with the view of the restricting of zoos for the brutal activities involved.
On the one hand, it is argued that animals should not or must not be kept in zoos for a variety of reasons. Firstly, animals living in zoos tend to be kept in small cages, where they are fed by artificial foods and are reliant on humans for their livelihood. Secondly, the majority of zoos serve as a form of entertainment for both local people and tourists, in which those owners can generate revenues on them. More importantly, some animals here are subjects or specimens in conducting such cruel scientific researches, where they are suffered from stress, pain and eventually death. This is mistreatment with animals, against animal rights, we have no right to use animals for entertainment and profit.
On the other hand, other people claim that zoos play an important role in acting as places for preserving wildlife. With such space to protect wild animals, zoos would also help to save the animals in danger of extinction. However, even though it is true to some extent, animals in zoos are provided with limited space in artificial habitats, in which the rights for freedom are deprived of those animals. Besides, some endangered animals live in uncommonly special habitats that cannot be replicated by zoos. One of the most efficient ways to preserve animals in the endangered list is through the protection of their natural habitats, therefore zoos do not hold the critical role in this field.
In conclusion, despite the argument that zoos can help to preserve wild animals, they do not play a crucial role, instead, the cruelty of zoos in form of entertainment, scientific researches and animals’ dependent on humans for survive sounds more sensible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05198776758 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77989557253 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6700940824 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241918726612 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986950154977 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402017892254 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164406494202 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266964530728 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.