World has become global village, with numerous
multinational companies working all over the globe. Whereas, some individuals assert that it is beneficial for everyone. Withstanding, I totally agree with this assertion.
Admittedly, nowadays several international companies like to work in less affluent nations, due to availability of cheap labour and area. While, the government is also benefited from the taxes on finished goods and other things, which make country economically more sound. Moreover, it provide job opportunity to number of local people, thus improves financial condition of dwellers of host nation. To illustrate, in India about 40% of people are working in multinational companies like amazon, nike, flipcart and many more. Hence, it is reducing poverty in underdeveloped and developing nations.
Additionally, now any international product can be found in any nook and corner of world, which is making people similar in terms of food, clothes and gadgets so, this will eventually reduce the discrimination among inhabitants of earth, making it more friendly place to live. Furthermore, it will rise the level of labour class, they will get more rights and more pay. For instance, local companies do not provide them all privileges but multinational one does. Finally, it is boon for country and its citizens.
In conclusion, world is becoming smaller and industry is increasing with great pace which is advantageous for everyone, decreasing the hate and promoting harmony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has become global village, with numerous multinational companies working all over...
^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...y economically more sound. Moreover, it provide job opportunity to number of local peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dwellers of host nation. To illustrate, in India about 40% of people are working...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58260869565 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06414103828 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.678260869565 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6407975176 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131227673602 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480416687402 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505780339928 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685893695538 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459763653281 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.