Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Being successful in any positions can be most of people’s fantasy. There are numerous careers in which people have the ability to accomplish and attain a large amount of money. It is a fact that sports personalities achieve more money than other significant celebrities. A large number of people are of the opinion that it is entirely justified. Meanwhile, others say it is unjust. These two views will be analyzed in sequence before my own idea will be presented.
According to the first group who feel getting a lot of money by sports stars, the notion of fairness, in this group’s view, will get regarded. As an example, owing to the hard job and the high pressure of news media on sports professionals, the
super salaries are justified. Hence, due to the previous case there is nothing wrong with getting huge earnings by those people. This is why this view is supported by many.
On the other hand, by getting high incomes by sports personalities, many people whose idea is that salaries for these two types of professions should be legitimate, say that every aspects surrounding these two groups should be taken into account. For instance, other important positions such as doctors and officials, who try more than others to get the satisfaction of people, do not obtain money as much as a sports player does. For this reason, proponents of this thesis claim that the incomes need to be reasonable. And this is a reason supported by some.
In brief, after analyzing how the salaries of celebrities should be, justified or unfair, I personally think that the money given to people who have important personalities demands a balanced amount so that the fairness gets observed in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...ney than other significant celebrities. A large number of people are of the opinion that it is en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...eople, do not obtain money as much as a sports player does. For this reason, proponent...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in brief, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92733564014 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79623742531 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6107714734 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296159962459 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952823351404 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461003921969 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143954885565 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647887836379 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.