Task 2: Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?
It is visualized by many people that some consequences might happen because of the phenomenon of cars and bicycles are used to transport in a similar lane. This essay would like to point out some inevitable issues, and some solutions are also given to mitigate this tendency.
On the one hand, there are some obvious problems with this trend. Firstly, due to the huge disparity in the speed range between two means of transportation, drivers and cyclists might take a higher risk to get involved in accidents and collisions these days. If every nation could construct and separate different lanes for each vehicle, these people could feel safer whenever they commute on the road. Secondly, the traffic congestion would take place more often when transporting in rush hours. More importantly, those cyclists might find it tough and exhausted to fight with modern vehicles and return to their homes on time. As a result, this discourages people from engaging in this friendly-environmental vehicle, and obviously, the environmental protection would become harder to solve.
On the other hand, some given methods should be implemented by the administrations to tackle this problem. The initial solution is that the government should invest more budget in upgrading the infrastructure and constructing a safe zone for bicycle users. By doing this action, more citizens might tend to use bicycles to go to work or study instead of some unfriendly means of transportation such as cars, motorcycles or scooters. Furthermore, car drivers being limited on some roads in high-peak hours could be implemented. This might help some developing nations solve this issue temporarily or in the short term if they still face financial constraints.
To conclude, while this phenomenon could result in a higher risk of accidental incidents and pollutions, some implementations should be applied to mitigate those impacts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33774834437 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07648505888 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9804610184 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21726763409 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776980818064 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625612726585 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128595314944 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043415884764 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.