There have been many inventions in human history, such as wheels. Some people think the most important thing is the Internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
First of all, I believe that both of them are also important. The reason why is that the past inventions are the foundation of the internet and the others nowadays advanced technology.
In my opinion, I reckon that the past innovations are the basis of nowadays inventions. If we don't look at the past, reflect on the previous experience, and learn something in the past, then we won’t ever be progressing. While, the past innovations are a symbol to all of us, as a milestone to recognize how hard-working of those great scientists is. That also will inspire our next generation, especially our adolescent to have an aspiration in the science field and create a new perspective. In order to build a better future for all of us.
On the other hand, the internet does help us a lot. For example, if we don't innovate it, then we won’t have a lot of online entertainment, such as online games, Youtube, and tons of online chatting platforms. Meanwhile, as the pandemic goes on, I recognize the importance of the internet. For instance, it can help us to chat with our friends, even though one of my friends is in England. The internet assists us across the boulder of distance and the language. I still remember when I first came to Canada, my English level was pretty low, but I successfully used the online translation to deal with the language barrier.
To sum up, no matter the past invention or internet, these are important to all of us, not only just in usage but also in the history of human technological development, to reminisce about how great scientists are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eflects the nowadays advanced technology I reckon that the past innovations are t...
^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the basis of nowadays inventions. If we dont look at the past, reflect on the previo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... does help us a lot. For example, if we dont innovate it, then we won’t have a lot o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7032967033 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83015335446 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8412460585 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106045640552 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363965927602 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351888374225 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730172466338 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385307774092 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.