These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
Based on the diversity of age groups in many offices or companies in recent years, people can find out many different types of peers who are interwoven together in similar workplace more popular as a marked milestone. I strongly believe that although any circumstances have their own pros and cons, the benefits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks.
Turning to the key disadvantages of the argument, there are two main point which have an impact on the communal activities in the companies. First of all, there is a considerable gap between two generations which affects the quality of work. For instance, young people often use new solutions to handle with their jobs due to their bright outlooks. In contrast, old peers argue that the ways of teenagers are too strange and they will be at risk. Secondly, it is complicated when leaders attempt to maintain the relationship between old employers and others. As a result, old people are always self-esteem due to their experiences and their positions in the companies which lead to a debatable issue.
On the other hand, in spite of the fact that mix two generations in the same workplace is really complex, there is no doubt that if people adapt to this circumstance, they will be triumphant. Take multinational companies is a shining example, if they can keep working balance between old employers and young people, it is possible to enhance their profits in the future. In addition, they not only find out the harmony in their job, but they also share many experiences from their knowledge. For example, old people can encourage young employers never give up while the youth may support elders to get familiar with modern technologies.
In conclusion, I completely believe that the advantages of this circumstance outweigh the disadvantages if people open up and receive the opinion of other generation. Therefore, they can narrow the gap between them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...es in recent years, people can find out many different types of peers who are interwoven toget...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05678233438 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84731728389 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0102028424 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4285714286 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156972246376 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515007063062 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504871691806 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982393238114 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173813600098 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.