Today, TV channels provide man's sport show more than women's sport show. Why? Should TV channel give equal time for women's sport and men's sport?
TV networks have been prioritizing men's sport programmes over those of women. Several factors are responsible for this gap in popularity and I do not think that both deserve an equal amount of air time.
This imbalance by TV stations is believed to emerge from financial interest.
As men’s sports shows are generally more well-received than women’s, the channels have to satisfy the market by showing more of such programmes to generate more revenue. This dominance of men’s sports over their counterparts in TV shows demand stems from the differences in male and female preferences, which is males are often into sports while females are not. Obviously, having a low player pool means that women’s sports shows have less to offer to the audience, bringing less profits to TV providers when compared to men’s. For example, Men’s World Cup, which is a quadrennial international football event, is broadcast all over the world while Female’s World cup is often neglected by TV providers. It is commercial benefits that incentivize TV channels to favour Men’s World Cup to Women’s.
It is not advisable that TV channels impose the same broadcast time for two categories as the decision should be based on the commercial potential. If TV channels cut down the air time of men’s sports shows to force a statistically balanced amount for both genders, they could face losses in revenue. This reduction in profit is due to the viewer’s lack of interest in women’s sports. As the shift is implemented, the viewers who have no interest in women’s sports are unlikely to welcome women’s sports shows, thus, possibly cancelling their subscription to the channel.
In conclusion, the uneven air time between men’s and women’s sports shows could be explained from an economic standpoint. It is also not beneficial for TV channels to push a balanced air time for both shows in terms of finance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun profits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...less to offer to the audience, bringing less profits to TV providers when compared t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13418530351 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85693396419 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8266619567 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551433639409 0.244688304435 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194875912377 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988530225975 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291322455119 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13747745671 0.056905535591 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.