When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Tradition is intrinsic part of our culture. With that in mind, some people think using traditional skills instead of using technology is better while others claims opposite. There is other opinion too who thinks together, the two would have their charming and we can deny one of them. In my opinion, every country must keep pace with updating technologies, In the following paragraphs, I contend my reasons.
First and foremost, reason is about facilities which technology can give us in compare of traditional skills. As far as I know high human risk and be harder are some feature of traditional skills that were solve by technologies. For instance, using technologies in constructing towers decreases the number of workers who fall of.
Second reason is about time and cost. Time and cost are the most important factors in every works. Technologies can reduce both to halve which is very economically. For example, companies are no longer implanting traditional skills. Also, it should be noted that new strategy of manufactures is using equipment and robots. There is no need to welder as robot can weld by high accuracy and minimum time. On the other hand, employing a welder need more cost and time since they must give him salary. Plus, human can not work more than definite time but robot can work more time than human.
To wrap it up, in spite of all possible advantages of traditional skills and way of life, I believe keeping them alive is a big mistake. That is partly because of great merits of technologies versus tradition ways
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...feature of traditional skills that were solve by technologies. For instance, using te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90839694656 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68732649222 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618320610687 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3985476504 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.6470588235 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109354690352 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350617428284 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478035727926 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864831943335 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698492222895 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.