Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Protection of wild animals have become biggest issue of the world. Therefore, every year government spend heavy amount of money-saving them. But some people opposite this point of view because they believe that in modern century would not have need of wasting money on wild creäture. While I completely disagree with the statement and this essay will offer strong evidence why we should keep wildlife.
Wild animals are the part of food chain if this chain distribute than it will show effect on all animals including human. Therefore, Government should give preferences to saving to rare species such as white tiger, blackjack, black panther and so on. Furthermore, the population of variety of animals can be only control by wild animal such as tiger who eat buffalo, wild pig and dog. Otherwise, if tiger would vanish in the forest as result nobody may stop the increasing the population of animal and nation would have need heavy amount of money for killing this creäture. So, everybody have need to wild animal for surviving happy in the world, cause of this everybody should give their best to saving them.
world, cause of this everybody should give their best to saving them.
On the other hand, the forest is continually cutting for fulfilling the food and habitats requirements, specially for agricultural purpose. That reason why people said that in 21st century have no place for wild animal, because today human is very selfish.
In the conclusion, for saving the ecosystem each person make duties toward wild animal. Otherwise, one day would come in humans life when they would finish in the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the biggest'.
Suggestion: become the biggest
Protection of wild animals have become biggest issue of the world. Therefore, every ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at buffalo, wild pig and dog. Otherwise, if tiger would vanish in the forest as r...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: World
...hould give their best to saving them. world, cause of this everybody should give th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, for saving the ecosystem each person make duties toward wild animal. Otherwi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03345724907 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4638400098 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8867411312 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207188495937 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744929489336 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616791049551 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994070987319 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586171391502 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.