Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that it is pointless to protect wild animals since they play no role in the 21st century. I strongly disagree with this opinion and believe that part of government expenditure should be allocated to wildlife conservation for the sake of human existence on Earth.
Adherents to the idea that wild animals do not deserve government spending often base their argument on the following reason. Wild species and their habitats have no direct connection to human life. In other words, the extinction of any wild animals would exert impact on human beings, so protecting them is just a waste of money and time. Instead, they argue that public money should be spent on tackling pressing problems in modern society such as poverty, unemployment and poor health system for increase public well-being.
However, this reasoning is irrational to me since wild species are not only instrumental in maintain biodiversity nature, but also plays a vitally significant role in human life. Firstly, if any wild animal dies out, it will disrupt the whole food chain, resulting in the disappearance of other animals and plants. Subsequently, the delicate balance of the ecosystem would be disturbed, which would then lead to deleterious environmental consequences. Furthermore, conservation of natural habitat of wildlife species would contribute to the economic growth, especially in agricultural sector. This is because the majority of plant species, both growing naturally or being grown in artificial condition, is pollinated by bees- a wild animal. The extinction of bees would halt the reproduction of plants, thus lowering agricultural productivity. Such examples have proven how pivotal wild species is in the 21st century.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that wildlife conservation is of paramount importance and protecting wild animals is a must in modern life, not a waste of resources as many people think.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. Write a report for a university lecturer, describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mals since they play no role in the 21st century. I strongly disagree with this o...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l wild species is in the 21st century. In conclusion, I strongly believe that w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40397350993 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98383875489 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1652245864 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235483057071 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825723165871 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790786842094 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146714009818 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358442642041 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.