You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from
your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Some people say that that individuals' abilities are too weak to modify their living environment, so they prefer depending on government or big co-operations. However, this essay disagree this view because an individual can also improve his environment. This essay is going to discuss that people's ideas and efforts play an important part in improving the environment.
Firstly, individuals' ideas play an important part in designing the schedule for improving the environment. Basing on this fact, people can provide some creative ideas to evoke the whole society concerning on environmental issues. As an evidence of this, a book, A Sand County Almanac, by Aldo Lepold, advocates a responsible relationship existing between people and the land they inhabit. From then on Americans has been thinking how to conserve natural environment. Therefore, individuals can improve their environment owing to themselves.
Moreover, not only can individuals' thinking improve the environment, but also people's right habits and life-style may benefit the environment. Firstly, if a person can control his luxury desire about cars, it will reduce the emission of carbon dioxide. What's more, provided that people insist on classifying their living garbage, the wastes might be disposed of easier, so the environment will gain less detrimental effects. Thus, if a citizen keeps good habits, it will improve the environment undoubtedly.
However, some people insist that there is no organization, meaning that man or woman will endure shortage of funds to engage in the environmental career. Because of this, they can not improve the environment well. Nonetheless, if fact, if people are enthusiastic to protect environment, they will do better than some employees of government or companies.
To recapitulate what has been discussed previously, this essay illustrates that people's abilities and living habits will improve their living environment, even through they might face a shortage of financial support. Thereby, this essay supports individuals can improve the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... reduce the emission of carbon dioxide. Whats more, provided that people insist on cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65064102564 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05867821282 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544871794872 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6284438292 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207803756764 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863265351431 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587172635747 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133709824292 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153611466914 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.