17/09/2017 Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host countries should welcome cultural difference.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Tourism has been thriving since the 1990s in many regions of the planet. Some aver that following local mores and conduct is a necessity. Others argue that locals ought to praise newcomers with their culture. Below both prospects will be discussed in details and author’s opinion will be stated.
On the one hand, accepting local customs and behavior brings some benefits. Firstly, it allows a commuter to submerge in a foreign, even alien culture and for many, this is the main goal and attraction of travelling overseas. Secondly, merging with local culture gives an indispensable opportunity to understand it. Today when hundreds of thousands are travelling in the world every day, it may be exceptionally useful because comprehension reduces hostility and biased attitude toward those who represent other cultures. In other words, having new experiences and thrill as well as deeper acceptance of others are the main gains of the prospect.
On the other hand, the position that visitors ought to be welcomed by locals has some merits as well. Primarily, tourism is an important source of money for many states. Demonstration of willingness to accept abroad cultures and friendliness toward guests may attract crowds of people and consequently, their money that will fill government’s coffers with dollars and euros brought by foreigners. Additionally, looming globalization requires countries to be more open. In fact, the trend is strong and the process seems to be unstoppable and inevitable. If states refuse to adapt and embrace newcomers’ cultures, they may be thrown aside by the developing world and that means facing economic decline and even complete devastation. Accordingly, the stance allows host countries to attract travelers and their money as well as to evolve into modern and cosmopolitan states.
In my opinion, both points of view have their considerable gains and thus conduct of visitors, as well as states' policies, should derive from their motives and reasons.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
with their culture.
with their cultures.
flaws:
Better not repeat words/phrase like: 'as well as...', it is repeated 3 times.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 315 350
No. of Characters: 1635 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.213 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.19 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.756 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.529 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.601 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.279 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.477 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Is it better to completely
Is it better to completely agree/disagree or partly agree/ disagree with such question as "to what extent do you agree or disagree?"
p.s.
To check whether I understood this issue correctly
University should accept equal numbers of make and female students in every subject.
-advantages of this point: equality between men and women; new point of view on subject.
-disadvantages there may not be equal competition among students etc
conclusion: the policy has cons and pros.
Is this plan ok?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39365079365 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96839826489 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.674252522 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212504574731 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629208643981 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501860078849 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11898488384 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178979477822 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.